One-Rupee Note

The One-Rupee Note occupies a unique and symbolic position in India’s monetary system. Unlike other currency notes, it is issued not by the central bank but by the Government of India, reflecting a distinct constitutional and historical arrangement. In the context of banking, finance and the Indian economy, the One-Rupee Note represents monetary sovereignty, continuity of legal tender status and the evolution of currency management in India.
Although its economic value in transactions is limited in modern times, the One-Rupee Note retains legal, historical and institutional significance within India’s financial framework.

Historical Background of the One-Rupee Note

The One-Rupee Note has its origins in the colonial period, when it was first issued during the early twentieth century. At that time, lower-denomination notes were introduced to supplement coins and facilitate everyday transactions. After Independence, India retained the One-Rupee Note within its monetary system, continuing the legacy with modifications in design and authority.
Over the decades, the note has been issued, withdrawn and reintroduced multiple times, depending on economic conditions, cost considerations and policy priorities. Despite periods of discontinuation, its legal status as currency has never been abolished.

Legal and Constitutional Basis

The most distinctive feature of the One-Rupee Note is its issuing authority. Unlike other banknotes, which are issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the One-Rupee Note is issued by the Government of India under the provisions of the Indian Coinage Act and related legal frameworks.
The note bears the signature of the Finance Secretary to the Government of India rather than the Governor of the central bank. This arrangement reflects the fact that the Reserve Bank of India is legally responsible for issuing currency notes of denominations two rupees and above, while the Government retains authority over the lowest denomination.

Design and Key Features

The One-Rupee Note is relatively simple in design compared to higher-denomination banknotes. It typically features the Ashoka Pillar emblem, reinforcing its status as a sovereign instrument. The colour scheme and layout have varied slightly over time, but the emphasis has remained on clarity and durability.
Key features include:

  • Denomination of one rupee
  • Issuance by the Government of India
  • Signature of the Finance Secretary
  • Status as legal tender for unlimited amounts

Despite its modest value, the note carries full legal tender status, meaning it must be accepted for transactions if offered.

Role in the Banking System

In practical banking operations, the One-Rupee Note plays a minimal role due to its low purchasing power and limited circulation. Banks do not typically use it for routine cash management or high-volume transactions.
However, its presence in the banking system underscores the legal completeness of India’s currency structure. Banks are required to treat it as valid legal tender, and it may occasionally appear in deposits, withdrawals or accounting balances involving small residual amounts.

Importance in Monetary and Fiscal Context

From a monetary perspective, the One-Rupee Note symbolises the boundary between government-issued currency and central bank-issued currency. It highlights the shared but distinct roles of fiscal authority and monetary authority in India’s financial system.
While the Reserve Bank of India manages monetary policy, currency circulation and financial stability, the Government of India’s issuance of the One-Rupee Note reflects sovereign responsibility over the unit of account. This arrangement has largely symbolic significance today but remains important from a constitutional and institutional standpoint.

Economic Relevance in the Indian Economy

In the contemporary Indian economy, the One-Rupee Note has limited transactional relevance due to inflation and changes in consumption patterns. Coins have largely replaced low-denomination notes for everyday use, as they are more durable and cost-effective.
However, the note retains relevance in:

  • Symbolising monetary continuity and sovereignty
  • Educational and historical contexts
  • Collectors’ and numismatic interest
  • Reinforcing the concept of legal tender

Its continued issuance, even in limited quantities, reflects policy intent to preserve this symbolic element of the currency system.

Comparison with One-Rupee Coin

In practice, the One-Rupee Coin is far more common than the One-Rupee Note. Coins are preferred for their durability and lower replacement costs. From an operational efficiency standpoint, coins are better suited for low-value transactions in a large and populous economy like India.
Nevertheless, the coexistence of the One-Rupee Note and coin highlights the layered nature of India’s currency system, where historical instruments coexist with modern monetary practices.

Originally written on April 21, 2016 and last modified on January 3, 2026.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *