Surface Weather Analysis

Surface weather analysis is a specialised form of weather mapping that depicts the distribution of meteorological elements—such as air pressure, temperature, wind, and cloud cover—across a geographical region at a given moment. Derived from observations gathered at ground-based weather stations, these analyses support the identification of synoptic-scale features including weather fronts, high- and low-pressure systems, and precipitation areas. By combining observational data with meteorological interpretation, surface analyses underpin short-term forecasting and provide essential information for understanding atmospheric dynamics.

Historical Development of Weather Mapping

The earliest weather maps of the nineteenth century were drafted retrospectively in an effort to understand storm behaviour. Before the invention of the telegraph, weather information travelled too slowly to be of real-time value. By the mid-1840s, telegraph networks enabled the simultaneous transmission of weather observations from numerous locations. This technological advance allowed the Smithsonian Institution during the late 1840s to become the first organisation to construct real-time surface analyses in the United States.
Between the 1840s and 1860s, a nationwide observational network developed and was later inherited by the US Army Signal Corps, which expanded it to the Pacific coast. Parallel efforts in Great Britain led to the first attempts at time standardisation by 1855, addressing the earlier problem of inconsistent observation times. By 1905 the entire United States adopted standard time zones, ensuring that weather observations could be meaningfully compared.
Internationally, countries began issuing simultaneous observations from 1873 onwards. The advent of the Norwegian cyclone model in the late 1910s introduced the modern concept of weather fronts to meteorology—lines demarcating boundaries between contrasting air masses. Despite this, the United States did not routinely depict fronts on surface analyses until 1942, when the WBAN Analysis Center opened in Washington, D.C.
The automation of map plotting emerged in 1969 in the United States and was largely completed by the mid-1970s. Hong Kong achieved automated surface analysis by 1987. By the late 1990s computer systems had advanced sufficiently to allow meteorologists to combine satellite imagery, radar data, and model-generated fields with surface observations. This integration improved the accuracy and clarity of analyses. In 2001 the various analyses produced within the National Weather Service were unified into the Unified Surface Analysis, issued every six hours and incorporating input from multiple forecast centres.

Techniques and Symbols Used in Surface Analysis

Surface analyses employ a standardised set of symbols and conventions to represent meteorological conditions. Frontal systems, cloud cover, wind, precipitation, isobars, and other features are coded compactly to maintain map readability. High-pressure centres appear as “H” and low-pressure centres as “L” on English-language maps, while other nations may use alternate symbols such as “A” and “B”.
A central interpretive tool is the station model, a compact graphic that summarises weather conditions at a specific observation site. The plotted elements include:

  • Temperature and dew point
  • Wind speed and direction (indicated by barbs)
  • Atmospheric pressure and its tendency
  • Ongoing weather phenomena
  • Cloud cover, represented by a filled or partially filled circle

Wind barbs denote both direction and magnitude: each full flag represents a set wind speed value, half flags indicate lesser speeds, and filled triangles denote higher categories. Outside the United States, temperature and dew point are plotted in degrees Celsius, and precipitation is measured in millimetres.
Once a field of station models is plotted, analysts draw isobars (equal pressure), isallobars (pressure change), isotherms (equal temperature), and isotachs (equal wind speed). These contours highlight patterns that reveal the location and intensity of key synoptic-scale features.

Synoptic-Scale Features and Their Characteristics

Surface weather analyses illustrate large-scale atmospheric structures typically extending several hundred kilometres or more.
Low-pressure systems, or cyclones, occur at minima in the pressure field. In the northern hemisphere they rotate counterclockwise with inward-moving surface winds; the reverse occurs in the southern hemisphere. Cyclones are commonly associated with cloudiness, rising motion, and precipitation. Special forms include:

  • Polar lows, formed when cold air passes over relatively warm seas
  • Tropical cyclones, intense warm-core systems
  • Winter storms, characterised by strong gradients and widespread precipitation

Thermal lows may also develop over land during hot summer periods.
High-pressure systems, or anticyclones, rotate outward at the surface. They are associated with subsiding air, warming by compression, and clearer skies. Persistent high pressure can trap pollutants near the surface, worsening air quality.

Frontal Boundaries

A front is the boundary between air masses of differing temperature, humidity, and density. A frontal zone contains a transition layer, and the front itself is defined at the warm edge of this zone. Frontal symbols on surface analyses depict:

  • Cold fronts
  • Warm fronts
  • Stationary fronts
  • Occluded fronts

These boundaries are fundamental in predicting changes in weather conditions, including shifts in temperature, wind direction, and precipitation.

The Station Model as an Analytical Tool

The station model enables dense spatial plotting without visual clutter. Each observation point summarises local conditions, and the collection of these models across a map provides the detailed dataset required for further analysis. Analysts use this information to identify pressure centres, depict wind patterns, and discern frontal locations. The system’s abstraction allows for rapid interpretation even in complex synoptic situations.

Originally written on September 26, 2016 and last modified on December 8, 2025.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *