Imperialism II Age of Exploration

Imperialism II Age of Exploration

Imperialism II: Age of Exploration is a turn-based strategy computer game developed by Frog City Software and published by Strategic Simulations, Inc. (SSI) in 1999. It is the sequel to the 1997 title Imperialism and represents a significant shift in historical focus, moving from the nineteenth-century Industrial Revolution to the sixteenth-century Age of Exploration. In the game, the player assumes the role of the ruler of a European power and is tasked with building a global empire through exploration, economic management, diplomacy, and warfare. Since 2001, the rights to the Imperialism trademark have been owned by Ubisoft.
The game is widely regarded as part of the 4X strategy genre, yet it distinguishes itself by placing an unusually strong emphasis on economic systems and logistics rather than purely military expansion. This focus has made Imperialism II a notable example of a strategy game in which long-term planning and resource allocation are central to success.

Development and Historical Setting

Imperialism II was designed as an evolution of its predecessor rather than a radical departure. While retaining the core mechanics of empire-building and global competition, the developers introduced a new historical context that better suited themes of exploration, colonisation, and mercantilism. The sixteenth-century setting reflects a period in which European powers expanded overseas in search of resources, trade routes, and political influence.
This historical shift allowed the game to introduce an “Old World” and a “New World”, mirroring the realities of early modern imperial expansion. Unlike the original Imperialism, which began with the entire world visible, Imperialism II limits initial knowledge to Europe and surrounding regions, requiring players to actively explore unknown territories across the oceans.

Core Gameplay and the 4X Framework

Imperialism II is a turn-based 4X strategy game, requiring players to eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate to achieve victory. However, its interpretation of these principles is more economically driven than is typical of the genre. Military conquest is only one of several viable paths, and in many cases economic strength and diplomatic influence are more decisive.
Each turn represents a period in which the player manages production, transport, trade, research, diplomacy, and military operations. Decisions are interconnected, and short-term gains often come at the expense of long-term stability. The game rewards careful balancing rather than aggressive expansion alone.

The Economic Model

The defining feature of Imperialism II is its complex economic system. Unlike many strategy games where resources become instantly usable once acquired, Imperialism II requires resources to be transported and processed before they can be used. This creates a layered production model in which logistics and planning are essential.
The player faces three principal allocative dilemmas, alongside the constant need to supply food and fund scientific research.
Transportation dilemma. The empire’s merchant marine has limited capacity, forcing the player to decide how shipping space is allocated. Ships can be used to transport raw materials and precious goods from overseas territories, import manufactured goods, or carry food such as fish to support workers and military units. Because shipping capacity is finite, prioritising one function inevitably restricts another.
Labour allocation dilemma. Once raw materials reach the homeland, workers must convert them into semi-finished materials. The player must choose which intermediate goods to produce, balancing military needs, infrastructure development, and economic expansion.
Resource allocation dilemma. Semi-finished materials can be used in several ways: to build military or civilian units, to improve terrain productivity, to expand logistics networks, or to sustain higher levels of worker productivity. These competing uses mean that economic decisions are rarely straightforward.
This system ensures that economic planning is a continuous challenge rather than a one-time optimisation.

Production Chains and Logistics

Imperialism II models production through a multi-stage process. Raw materials are extracted from improved terrain, transported via roads or shipping routes, and then processed by workers into semi-finished materials. Only after this process can units or improvements be constructed.
Each unit or building requires a specific combination of semi-finished materials and labour. Naval units, infantry, cavalry, and infrastructure all draw upon different resource mixes, which in turn demand distinct raw materials. As a result, changing military priorities often requires restructuring the entire economy.
Logistics is deeply integrated into this system. Roads and shipping routes must be expanded to support growth, and these improvements themselves consume valuable materials. The economy therefore operates as an interconnected network in which bottlenecks can limit overall performance.

Labour Productivity and Food Supply

Food supply is a critical constraint in Imperialism II. Every worker, ship, and military unit consumes one unit of food per turn, drawn from sources such as wheat, meat, or fish. Expanding the workforce or maintaining large armed forces therefore depends on a stable and growing food supply.
Increasing food production requires investment in farms, fishing capacity, or transport infrastructure, all of which compete with other economic priorities. This mechanic discourages unchecked expansion and forces the player to consider sustainability.
Labour productivity is divided into four levels, with each higher level requiring access to a specific luxury good. By supplying luxuries, the player can increase total output without enlarging the workforce, thereby avoiding additional food demands. This system reflects historical realities of early modern economies, where access to colonial luxuries supported higher standards of living and productivity.

The Treasury and Economic Solvency

The imperial treasury plays a central role in the game. It finances scientific research, military campaigns, imports, and the creation or upgrading of civilian units. In diplomacy, treasury funds are used for grants and trade subsidies that influence other nations.
Income is generated through several channels, including the extraction of precious materials, the export of goods, and overseas profits derived from foreign resource exploitation. Poor economic planning can lead to bankruptcy, leaving the empire unable to defend itself or pursue technological advancement. As a result, financial management is as important as territorial expansion.

Diplomacy and Victory Conditions

Imperialism II places significant emphasis on diplomacy. Control over other countries can be achieved through conquest, political influence, or a combination of both. Minor nations may be persuaded to join the player’s empire, while rival great powers can be weakened through economic pressure or strategic alliances.
Victory is achieved when one of the major powers controls more than half of the Old World. Control of the New World, while economically valuable, is not directly required for victory. This reinforces the idea that overseas expansion serves as a means to dominate European politics rather than an end in itself.

Differences from the Original Imperialism

The most significant innovation in Imperialism II is the introduction of an explorable New World. Unlike the first game, only the Old World is visible at the start, and overseas territories must be discovered through exploration. The New World contains unique resources and luxuries not available in Europe, making exploration economically and strategically essential.
Another major difference lies in the historical timeframe. While Imperialism was set during the Industrial Revolution, Imperialism II begins in the sixteenth century. This shift changes the emphasis from industrial production and railways to maritime trade, colonial extraction, and mercantile competition.

Reception and Significance

Imperialism II received generally favourable reviews from critics and strategy enthusiasts. It was often praised for refining the systems introduced in the original game and for offering a deep, rewarding strategic experience. Reviewers frequently highlighted the game’s economic complexity and long-term planning requirements as its greatest strengths.
At the same time, the heavy emphasis on logistics and food supply was sometimes criticised as tedious, particularly by players seeking constant military action. Despite this, Imperialism II has maintained a strong reputation among fans of turn-based strategy as a thoughtful and challenging title.

Originally written on August 7, 2016 and last modified on December 17, 2025.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *