Gathaman Village’s Unique Panchayat Consensus Tradition
Gathaman village in Banaskantha district of Gujarat stands out for its unique Panchayat election tradition. Unlike most villages, Gathaman has not held a formal election since 1955. Instead, Hindu and Muslim communities share leadership roles through mutual agreement. This practice continues despite the village being ineligible for state grants under the Samras Gram Yojana due to bureaucratic technicalities.
Historical Background and Current Context
Since independence, Gathaman has avoided electoral voting for its Panchayat. The first Sarpanch was chosen in 1955 through consensus. For 70 years, the village has upheld this promise. The population of about 7,000 is almost evenly divided between Hindus and Muslims, encouraging a cooperative political culture. Recently, Raufaben Imran Patel became the Sarpanch, unanimously selected by both communities.
Consensus-Based Leadership Selection
Leadership alternates between Hindu and Muslim representatives. When the Sarpanch is from one community, the Deputy Sarpanch usually comes from the other. This balance maintains harmony and trust. The 2025 Sarpanch post was reserved for women, and the Muslim community nominated Raufaben Imran Patel. The Hindu community approved this choice, showing strong intercommunal respect.
Samras Gram Yojana and Grant Ineligibility
Gathaman follows the principles of the Samras scheme, which promotes unopposed Panchayat elections and provides financial grants. However, the village does not receive these funds. The reason is a reserved Scheduled Tribe (ST) ward in the Panchayat, despite no ST residents living there. This reservation, created decades ago due to a temporary registration, remains on record, disqualifying the village from grants.
Economic and Social Profile
Gathaman’s economy blends agriculture with skilled trades like watch repair. Many villagers have migrated to Mumbai, shifting from watchmaking to mobile phone repairs. The village manages an annual Panchayat budget of approximately ₹32 lakh. Despite lacking state financial support, the community’s commitment to consensus governance remains strong.
Community Trust and Governance Model
The village’s governance is built on trust and shared labour. Elders emphasise that the system is more than politics; it defines their identity. The mutual selection process has prevented electoral conflicts and ensured peaceful coexistence. This model marks the potential of consensus in local self-governance beyond formal electoral competition.
| Related | |
|---|---|
