Pakistan’s Role in UNSC
Pakistan secured roles in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as an elected non-permanent member for the 2025-26 term. It now chairs the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee and serves as the Vice Chair of the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee. Additionally, Pakistan is a Co-Chair in two informal working groups. This development raises questions about Pakistan’s influence and the implications for India.
Pakistan’s Election and Committee Roles
Pakistan’s recent election as a non-permanent member of the UNSC was part of the Asia-Africa grouping. This membership made it eligible to chair subsidiary bodies of the Council. The structure of the UNSC allows non-permanent members to take leadership roles in committees. Permanent members do not chair these committees to avoid conflicts of interest.
About the Committees
The 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee monitors sanctions against individuals and entities linked to the Taliban. The 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee focuses on member states’ responsibilities to combat terrorism in line with UNSCR 1373. Both committees require consensus among members for decisions, limiting unilateral actions.
Implications of Pakistan’s Chairmanship
Pakistan’s role in the 1988 Committee allows it to set the agenda and monitor sanctions. However, it does not possess special powers to unilaterally impose or lift sanctions. The political dynamics within the UNSC, particularly the influence of other members, will shape Pakistan’s effectiveness in this role.
Limitations of Influence
Pakistan’s ability to influence the 1988 Committee is constrained. The Taliban’s status as de facto rulers complicates sanctions discussions. Additionally, the technical nature of the Counter-Terrorism Committee focuses on capacity building rather than punitive measures. Pakistan’s record of violating UNSCR 1373 provisions further undermines its credibility in counter-terrorism discussions.
Concerns for India
Despite Pakistan’s roles, these positions do not pose a direct threat to Indian interests. The effectiveness of the UNSC and its subsidiary bodies in combating terrorism has been questioned. Pakistan’s past attempts to leverage its UNSC roles for political gain, particularly regarding Kashmir, indicate its strategic intentions.
The Broader Context
Pakistan’s upcoming presidency of the UNSC in July 2025 raises concerns about its potential to influence discussions on contentious issues. While procedural advantages exist, the presidency does not grant substantive powers. The challenges faced by the UNSC in addressing terrorism remain concern for all member states.
| Related | |
|---|---|
