Bhil Pradesh

Bhil Pradesh is a proposed Indian state envisioned to unite tribal-majority districts inhabited predominantly by the Bhil community, one of India’s largest and oldest tribal groups. The proposal seeks to create a unified administrative unit across regions currently spread over four states—Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, and Maharashtra—with the aim of improving governance, ensuring targeted tribal development, and preserving the distinct cultural identity of the Bhil people.

Background

The Bhils are an indigenous tribal group with a rich cultural heritage, traditionally inhabiting the western and central parts of India. Their history dates back centuries, and they are known for their close association with nature, unique art forms, and community-based lifestyle. Despite being numerically large, the Bhils have often been economically and politically marginalised.
The idea of forming Bhil Pradesh emerged in the mid-twentieth century, soon after India’s independence, when discussions on linguistic and cultural reorganisation of states gained momentum. Supporters of the movement argued that the Bhil-dominated areas were divided among multiple states, leading to administrative neglect and lack of coordinated development. Periodically, the demand for Bhil Pradesh has resurfaced through tribal movements, political rallies, and public campaigns seeking recognition and autonomy.

Geographical Extent

The proposed state of Bhil Pradesh is envisioned to comprise around forty to fifty districts from Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. These districts are contiguous and form a tribal belt extending across western and central India.
Key districts that are often mentioned as part of the proposal include:

  • From Rajasthan: Banswara, Dungarpur, Pratapgarh, and Udaipur.
  • From Madhya Pradesh: Jhabua, Alirajpur, Dhar, Barwani, and parts of Ratlam.
  • From Gujarat: Dahod, Panchmahal, Chhota Udaipur, and Narmada.
  • From Maharashtra: Nandurbar, Dhule, and parts of Nashik.

Together, these districts represent areas with high tribal populations, shared cultural traditions, and similar socio-economic conditions.

Objectives and Rationale

The demand for Bhil Pradesh is rooted in the desire for self-governance, cultural preservation, and focused development. The key arguments presented by supporters include:

  • Cultural Identity: The Bhil community shares linguistic and cultural similarities that transcend state boundaries. A separate state could promote and preserve Bhili and related dialects, folklore, art, and customs.
  • Economic Development: The tribal belt remains economically backward compared to other regions, with low literacy, poor healthcare access, and limited infrastructure. A separate state could prioritise local development.
  • Administrative Efficiency: Currently, welfare programmes for the Bhils are implemented separately by different state governments, often leading to duplication and inefficiency. A unified administration could ensure better coordination and effective use of resources.
  • Political Representation: Advocates argue that political under-representation of tribal communities in existing state governments has led to marginalisation. Bhil Pradesh could provide the community with a stronger political voice and autonomy in policymaking.

Challenges and Criticism

While the proposal carries emotional and cultural significance, it also faces several challenges and criticisms:

  • Administrative and Constitutional Hurdles: Creating a new state requires an amendment under Article 3 of the Indian Constitution, involving parliamentary approval and consultation with affected states. Since Bhil Pradesh spans multiple states, this makes the process highly complex.
  • Political Opposition: The four parent states are unlikely to cede territory, as this would involve a loss of land, population, and economic resources.
  • Practical Feasibility: Critics question whether the formation of a new state alone would resolve developmental issues without addressing systemic problems such as poverty, lack of infrastructure, and educational backwardness.
  • Ethnic Fragmentation: Some observers fear that creating states along ethnic or tribal lines may encourage similar demands elsewhere, potentially fragmenting the federal structure.
  • Resource Management: The proposed region has uneven access to water, industry, and infrastructure, which could pose challenges in sustaining a new administrative entity.

Social and Political Movement

The movement for Bhil Pradesh has been led by various tribal organisations, leaders, and social activists who have periodically mobilised local populations through rallies and demonstrations. The Akhil Bhartiya Adivasi Mahasabha and other regional tribal groups have played key roles in advocating the demand. Public meetings, posters, and symbolic state maps are used to raise awareness among tribal populations about their shared identity and common issues.
In many areas, particularly in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, tribal youth groups have taken up the cause, linking it to broader issues of land rights, education, and access to government services. Although the movement has not yet received formal political backing at the national level, it remains an important expression of tribal aspirations for recognition and empowerment.

Socio-Economic Context

The Bhil-inhabited regions generally fall within India’s Scheduled Areas, where special constitutional provisions exist to protect tribal interests under the Fifth Schedule. However, these protections have not always translated into tangible improvements. The region continues to face challenges such as land alienation, unemployment, and underdevelopment.
Creating a separate administrative structure, proponents argue, could facilitate:

  • Expansion of local employment opportunities.
  • Greater control over natural resources like forests and minerals.
  • Better access to education in local languages.
  • Implementation of welfare schemes specifically designed for tribal needs.

Current Status

As of today, Bhil Pradesh remains a proposed idea rather than an official plan for statehood. While discussions continue in tribal forums and among some political groups, the Government of India has not taken any formal steps towards the reorganisation of states in this regard.
The movement, however, symbolises the persistent demand among India’s tribal populations for autonomy, dignity, and fair development. Periodic demonstrations, particularly in the tribal regions of southern Rajasthan and western Madhya Pradesh, keep the issue in public discourse.

Significance

The Bhil Pradesh movement highlights important themes in India’s democratic and federal evolution. It underscores the need to balance regional identity, equitable development, and national unity. While the creation of a separate state may be uncertain, the issues raised—tribal representation, cultural preservation, and regional development—remain deeply relevant to India’s inclusive growth.

Originally written on November 1, 2018 and last modified on November 6, 2025.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *