NIRF Introduces Negative Scoring for Retracted Research Papers
The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) has taken step in promoting research integrity by introducing negative scores for higher education institutions with retracted papers and their citations. This new policy, effective from 2025, aims to discourage unethical research practices and enhance the quality of academic output across India.
Introduction of Negative Scoring in NIRF Rankings
For the first time, NIRF will deduct points from institutions that have research papers retracted in the last three calendar years. The penalties will apply both to the number of retractions and citations stemming from these papers. The negative scoring will be mild initially but will become stricter in subsequent years, signalling a zero-tolerance stance towards research misconduct.
About Retractions and Their Significance
Retractions occur when published papers are withdrawn due to errors or unethical practices like data fabrication, image manipulation, or undisclosed use of large language models (LLMs). While some retractions arise from genuine mistakes, the majority now result from deliberate misconduct. Retractions damage the credibility of institutions and undermine the trust in scientific research.
Ethical Research and Institutional Accountability
Institutions are urged to take responsibility for the work of their researchers. If they gain credit for publications, they must also face penalties for retractions. Internal quality control mechanisms should be strengthened to prevent unethical research. The focus must shift from quantity to quality and ethics in research output.
Impact on Institutional Rankings and Future Penalties
Research and Professional Practices form a key parameter in NIRF rankings, which considers publication volume, citation quality, and now retractions. Institutions with persistently high retraction rates may face harsher penalties, including blacklisting. This move aligns with international trends where research integrity increasingly influences rankings.
Global Trends and Journal Responses
Globally, the number of retractions has risen as journals become more vigilant. Investigations into fraudulent practices, including those involving paper mills and improper authorship changes, have increased. The time to retract flawed papers has shortened, reflecting stronger oversight and accountability in scholarly publishing.
Encouraging Ethical Research Practices in India
India’s research community is urged to uphold ethical standards to avoid negative comparisons with countries having higher retraction rates. Institutions must actively promote research ethics and improve governance. This approach will encourage a culture of integrity and enhance India’s global academic reputation.
| Related | |
|---|---|
