Carceral Feminism

Carceral feminism is a term used to describe a strand of feminist thought and activism that places emphasis on criminal justice interventions—such as policing, prosecution, and imprisonment—as the primary means of addressing gender-based violence and inequality. The concept critiques the alignment between feminist movements and punitive state systems, arguing that reliance on carceral (prison-based) solutions often reinforces structures of oppression rather than dismantling them.

Origins and Conceptual Background

The term carceral feminism gained prominence in the early 2010s, though its underlying critique emerged earlier within feminist and abolitionist scholarship. It was notably popularised by feminist scholar Elizabeth Bernstein, who used it to describe the convergence of feminist and neoliberal agendas that promote criminalisation as a means to achieve gender justice.
Carceral feminism developed out of the broader debates within second-wave feminism, particularly the anti-violence movements of the 1970s and 1980s, which sought to combat domestic violence, rape, and sexual harassment. Activists campaigned for stronger legal protections and accountability for perpetrators. While these efforts succeeded in making gender-based violence a recognised public issue, they also led to the expansion of state intervention in the form of stricter laws, policing, and incarceration.

Defining Features

Carceral feminism is characterised by its faith in the criminal justice system as a tool for achieving women’s liberation. Its key features include:

• Legal and punitive focus: Advocacy for harsher sentencing laws, mandatory arrest policies, and expanded definitions of sexual and domestic crimes.
• Partnership with state institutions: Collaboration between feminist organisations and police, courts, and prisons.
• Individualised understanding of harm: Framing gender-based violence primarily as a matter of individual deviance rather than systemic inequality.
• Neglect of structural context: Limited engagement with underlying issues such as poverty, racism, and social exclusion that contribute to violence and vulnerability.

While the intention of carceral feminist approaches is to protect women and secure justice, critics argue that these strategies often exacerbate inequalities, particularly for marginalised women, people of colour, and working-class communities.

Historical Development

During the 1970s and 1980s, feminist activists in countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia campaigned for reforms to address the state’s historical neglect of crimes like rape and domestic abuse. Feminists pushed for:

• The creation of rape crisis centres and women’s shelters.
• Criminalisation of marital rape.
• Mandatory arrest policies in domestic violence cases.
• The introduction of sexual harassment laws.

These reforms were instrumental in improving legal recognition of gender-based violence. However, as the movement became institutionalised, it increasingly depended on the state’s penal apparatus for enforcement. This alignment coincided with the broader political shift toward neoliberalism and the expansion of the prison–industrial complex.

Critiques of Carceral Feminism

Critics of carceral feminism argue that it prioritises punitive justice over transformative or restorative approaches and fails to challenge intersecting systems of power such as racism, colonialism, and economic inequality.

1. Reinforcement of State Power

Feminist reliance on the criminal justice system can strengthen state institutions historically complicit in gendered and racial violence. Police and prisons, rather than protecting all women equally, have disproportionately targeted Black, Indigenous, immigrant, and transgender communities.

2. Neglect of Marginalised Women

Carceral policies often harm the very groups feminism seeks to protect. For example, survivors of colour may avoid reporting violence due to mistrust of law enforcement or fear of deportation. Criminalisation also fails to address violence within marginalised communities, where structural inequalities remain the root cause.

3. Expansion of the Prison System

By supporting tougher laws and sentencing, carceral feminism inadvertently contributes to mass incarceration, a system that reproduces social harm rather than healing it. This critique has been central to abolitionist feminism, which views prisons as an extension of patriarchal and racial control.

4. Depoliticisation of Feminism

Focusing on individual offenders rather than systemic causes shifts feminism away from collective struggle. The framing of justice as punishment sidelines approaches rooted in restorative, community-based, or transformative justice, which aim to repair harm through social and relational change rather than retribution.

Abolitionist and Intersectional Feminist Alternatives

Opposition to carceral feminism has given rise to abolitionist feminism, a movement grounded in the belief that true gender justice cannot be achieved through carceral institutions. Abolitionist feminists such as Angela Davis, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, and Mariame Kaba argue that prisons and policing perpetuate gendered, racial, and economic violence.
Instead of relying on punitive systems, they advocate for:

• Restorative justice, which focuses on accountability, healing, and dialogue between offenders and survivors.
• Transformative justice, which seeks to address the social and structural conditions that enable violence.
• Community-based interventions, including survivor support networks, housing stability, and healthcare access.

These frameworks prioritise collective responsibility and social transformation, viewing gender-based violence as both a symptom and a product of broader systemic inequality.

Global and Contemporary Contexts

Although initially rooted in Western debates, critiques of carceral feminism now extend globally. In many countries, feminist advocacy for laws against sexual harassment, human trafficking, and domestic violence has intersected with state agendas focused on security, moral order, or border control.
For instance:

• Anti-trafficking campaigns have sometimes resulted in the policing and deportation of migrant sex workers rather than improving their safety.
• Domestic violence laws in some contexts have led to mandatory arrests that penalise survivors who act in self-defence.
• Counter-terrorism frameworks have occasionally co-opted feminist rhetoric to justify state surveillance and militarisation.

These examples reveal how carceral logics can be embedded in state and international feminist discourses, often at the expense of marginalised women’s autonomy.

Theoretical Significance

Carceral feminism has become a crucial analytical concept in contemporary feminist theory. It serves as a lens to examine the relationship between feminism and the state, highlighting tensions between justice and punishment, protection and control, emancipation and co-optation.
The critique also reaffirms the importance of intersectional feminism, which recognises that gender-based violence cannot be understood or addressed separately from race, class, sexuality, and other axes of oppression.

Contemporary Debates

In present feminist discourse, debates around carceral feminism continue to evolve, especially in light of global movements such as #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and Decolonise Feminism. These movements have reignited questions about how to achieve justice for survivors while resisting systems that reproduce harm.
Key areas of ongoing debate include:

• The role of police and courts in addressing sexual violence.
• The use of carceral measures in combating trafficking and gender-based crimes.
• The potential of community-led alternatives to replace punitive institutions.
• How to balance survivor advocacy with anti-racist and anti-capitalist commitments.