While throwing light upon various competing factors at play, critically examine the dichotomy between a legally guaranteed MSP with fiscal constraints and WTO regulations. Provide some recommendations on how the government can find a middle path forward.

The government faces three key constraints in meeting the farmers’ demands –

  1. Unfulfilled political promise of doubling farmer incomes by 2022, which becomes difficult without enhancing MSP or providing legal backing. Going back on these risks losing political support.
  2. Persistent demands from farmers organizations who have demonstrated ability to protest and extract concessions. Ignoring them risks provoking further unrest.
  3. Pressure from WTO and fiscal prudence arguments to reduce farm subsidies and MSP expenditure. This limits government’s ability to expand MSP coverage and amounts.

To find a middle path, the government could focus on long-term solutions instead of temporary price supports. For example:

  1. Draft a comprehensive agricultural policy and reform plan in consultation with states and farmers groups. This can address systemic issues on yields, irrigation, technology etc rather than just prices.
  2. Increase public investment in agriculture infrastructure, R&D, water efficiency etc. This can sustainably enhance productivity and farmer incomes instead of subsidies.
  3. Create more effective social safety nets and income support schemes for small and marginal farmers without distorting prices or violating WTO rules.
  4. Diversify risk management tools like crop insurance schemes, futures trading platforms etc to make farmer incomes less dependent solely on MSPs.
  5. Proactively communicate decisions and negotiate temporary concessions until long-term measures yield results. Build consensus and public support.

Undertaking these difficult reforms requires political will and skillful negotiations but can put Indian agriculture on a more sustainable path with shared growth for all stakeholders.


Leave a Reply