Q. Consider the following comparisons between Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) and Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP) based on the NIAS study: - FGDs are more expensive to install per MW than ESPs.
- FGDs help in controlling PM emissions more efficiently than ESPs.
- ESPs have been developed domestically by a public sector company.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Answer:
1 and 3 only
Notes: The correct option is B i.e., 1 and 3 only.
- FGDs are indeed more expensive to install per MW than ESPs thus, making statement 1 correct.
- Statement 2 is incorrect as ESP is better at PM reduction; FGD is for SO₂.
- Statement 3 is also correct since ESPs have been developed domestically by BHEL, a public sector company.