Q. Consider the following statements regarding the Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs): - DRTs are presided over by a presiding officer appointed by the State government.
- A presiding officer of a DRT must be qualified to be a District Judge.
- No court in the country except the Supreme Court and High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 has jurisdiction over matters dealt by DRTs.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Answer:
Only 2 and 3
Notes: Statement 1 is incorrect as the presiding officer of a Debt Recovery Tribunal is appointed by the Central Government, not the State Government. Statement 2 is correct—such a person must be qualified to be a District Judge. Statement 3 is also correct—no court other than the Supreme Court and the High Courts (under Articles 226 and 227) has jurisdiction over DRT matters.