Q. Consider the following statements regarding the Doctrine of Eclipse:

1. A pre-constitutional law inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights is not void, but dormant.
2. Such a law remains operative for persons who do not enjoy Fundamental Rights.
3. Once the inconsistency is removed, the law revives and becomes enforceable.
4. The Doctrine of Eclipse applies equally to both pre- and post-constitutional laws.

Which of the above statements is / are correct?
Answer: Only 1, 2 and 3
Notes: The Doctrine of Eclipse states that a pre-constitutional law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights is not void but dormant (Statement 1). Such laws remain operative for non-citizens or those not entitled to the rights (Statement 2). They can be revived if inconsistency is removed (Statement 3). The doctrine applies only to pre-constitutional laws; Statement 4 is incorrect.