Current Affairs

GK MCQs Section
Q. In which case, Supreme court held that any Constitutional amendment that takes away or abridges a Fundamental Right conferred by Part III is void?
Answer: Golaknath v. State of Punjab, 1967
Notes: In Golaknath v. State of Punjab case, the Supreme Court held that an amendment of the Constitution is a legislative process, and that an amendment under article 368 is "law" within the meaning of article 13 of the Constitution and therefore, if an amendment "takes away or abridged" a Fundamental Right conferred by Part III, it is void.
Question Source: 📚This question has been sourced from GKToday's "40000+ GK / General Studies MCQs for SSC & State PCS Exams" App Exclusive Course in GKToday Android Application which provides more than 40K General Knowledge and General Studies questions with explanations asked in all Competitive Exams of India. Download the app here.
📌 Question Number: 27 in General Studies Mock Test - 91 in the above course in App.