Q. Consider the following statements about Balban's policy of consolidation:
  1. It was adopted due to the threat of external invasion
  2. Internal revolts were another reason for adopting this policy
  3. Indian Kings showing willingness to throw off the Turkish rule contributed to this decision
  4. His inherently weak nature compelled him to choose consolidation over conquest
Which of the above statements is / are correct?

Answer: Only 1, 2 and 3
Notes: Ghiyas-ud-din Balban, the ruler of Slave Dynasty, switched to the policy of consolidation due to multiple issues like the threat of external invasions, internal revolts, and the aspiration of Indian Kings to overthrow the Turkish rule. However, it wasn't his weak nature, but the political scenarios that led him to this decision, making the fourth option incorrect.

This Question is Also Available in:

हिन्दी
Question Source: 📚This question has been sourced from GKToday's "40000+ GK / General Studies MCQs for SSC & State PCS Exams" App Exclusive Course in GKToday Android Application which provides more than 40K General Knowledge and General Studies questions with explanations asked in all Competitive Exams of India. Download the app here.
📌 Question Number: 72 in 7. Mamluk dynasty (1206–90) in the above course in App.