Draft Labour Code – GKToday

Draft Labour Code

In April 2015, the Ministry of Labour and Employment had issued a draft Labour Code on Industrial Relations Bill, 2015 aimed at consolidation of the existing central labour laws. The proposed draft code seeks to replace the three laws viz. Trade Unions Act, 1926, Industrial Employment Act, 1946, and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This law was recommended by second National Commission on Labour (NCL). Further, the government is also working towards rationalizing the provision of 44 Labour laws by converting them into four labour codes including codes on wages, industrial relations, social security and welfare, and safety and working conditions of workers. The labour ministry has set up a tripartite committee with representatives from employer and trade unions and state government officials to look into all concerns to review the draft code. The ministry is planning to introduce the bill in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.

Key provisions of the draft bill

Key Provisions of the Draft Bill are as follows:

Criticism of the draft bill

Though the draft bill aims to create greater labour market flexibility and discipline in labour, it is criticised on various fronts.

  1. Trade unions argue that the draft code has been prepared keeping in mind only employer demands for greater labour market flexibility and labour discipline and it ignored the longstanding demands of trade unions.
  2. The limit of more than 300 employees to get permission from government for layoff will reduce the accountability of employers and exposing a much larger number of workers to arbitrary closures and en masse termination. According to the unions, 85% of the companies will be thrown out of the ambit of the Act and thus enable employers to hire and fire employees.
  3. The freehand for government to decide to exempt any establishment/industry from the act could result in workers being deprived of various basic rights including the right to organise and the right of access to justice. While a similar provision was inserted into the ID Act in 1982, it was never brought into force.
  4. The increased penalty will reduce the capacity of the workers to go on strike.
  5. The mandate of registration in a trade union to become office-bearer is against the standards contained in the ILO Convention of Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize (C.87) as it interferes with and limits the ability of workers to choose the persons they think best to be their leaders.
  6. The restriction of not to hold office in more than 10 unions is contrary to the principles of freedom of association.
  7. The code is not mentioned about collective bargaining and it is against the principles contained in ILO Convention No 98 requiring the promotion of collective bargaining.

Joint Bargaining Council

In October 2015, the labour ministry has agreed to revise the draft industrial relations code bill to allow constitution of a joint bargaining council to negotiate with the management in the event of a conflict. This will widen the workers participation in an organisation by including minority trade unions to be part of negotiations. The original draft allowed only a single trade union with 51% or more votes to be the sole negotiating agent with management. The revised draft will allow all unions having 15% or 18% of votes to have their representatives on the negotiating board when there is an absence of a two-thirds majority with any trade union at the time of voting. This will serve the twin objectives of giving wider representation to workers and ensuring that no single union walks away with all the powers.

The passage of this bill ease the doing business in the country by subsuming the 44 labour laws into four broad codes, dealing with industrial relations, wages, social security , industrial safety and labour welfare .

Conclusion

There is a need to update the labour laws, because these laws don’t reflect the requirements of the day. The Industrial Disputes Act, the Trade Unions Act, Factory Act and all other such acts were enacted in those times when liberalization, globalization or privatization was not even fully understood, let alone practiced. However, it is very challenging to make a delicate balance between the interest of the businessmen and those of the weaker section of the society. Further, reforms should bring inclusiveness and lead to economic growth along with job creation.

Exit mobile version